Funding stream
16 to 19 study programmes
National formula funding for students aged 16 to 18 on 31 August, 19+ continuers who began their programme aged 16 to 18, and students aged 19 to 24 with an Education, Health and Care plan, delivered as a study programme or a T Level.
ILR funding model 25Not to be confused with High needs
Understand it
What curriculum decisions do to funding
Curriculum teams make funding decisions every week without calling them that. This module connects each decision to the data it creates and the money it moves.
Read it16 to 19 funding: how the formula actually works
Student numbers, band, national rate, retention, programme cost weighting and uplifts. Where each element comes from, and which of them your own data controls.
Read itPlanned hours: what counts and how to evidence it
Planned hours set the funding band and therefore the rate for the whole year. What may be counted, what must be evidenced, and how to reconcile hours to a timetable.
Read itLearning support: the evidence chain from need to claim
Need assessed, support delivered, cost recorded, claim made. Every link has to hold, and a gap anywhere makes the claim indefensible however genuine the support was.
Read itReading an allocation statement
What an allocation is, which elements are formula-driven, which are lagged, and what to reconcile it against.
Read itThe rules in one place
Each statement is labelled so you can tell an official requirement from our explanation of one.
16 to 19 provision is funded through a national formula applied to a student's study programme, not through a price per qualification.
Planned hour changes for a 16 to 19 student are usually restricted to the first 6 weeks. If a planned activity stops before the end of the programme, the missed planned time must be replaced with other meaningful activity rather than the planned hours reduced. When a student finishes an element early, the planned hours are not amended and the reduction must not take them below the band first recorded.
A 16 to 19 student's funding band is determined by their planned hours for the year (the total of planned qualification hours and other planned, timetabled, education-related activity), together with their age and whether they have high needs.
Learning support funding requires a documented chain: an assessed need, the support actually provided, the cost of providing it, and the claim made. A claim without the chain is not defensible.
When it goes wrong
A learner left weeks ago but is still showing as continuing
The learner has stopped attending, but the ILR still shows their aim as open with no actual end date, so the system believes they are still in learning and keeps generating funding for them.
An aim has ended but no outcome has been recorded
The aim has an actual end date, so the system knows it finished, but nothing records whether the learner achieved it. The achievement rate calculation treats an aim with no achievement recorded as a non-achievement.
Funding dropped this month and nobody can explain why
The funding report for this period shows less than expected, or less than last period. Because every return restates the whole year, a change made this month can move earnings reported in earlier months, so the drop may have nothing to do with this month's delivery.
A funded learner has no eligibility evidence on file
Funding has been claimed for the learner, but the college cannot produce the evidence that they were eligible for it. The claim may be entirely correct and still fail, because at audit the evidence is the claim.
Learning support is claimed but the evidence chain is incomplete
A learning support claim has been made, but one of the links in the chain is missing: the assessment of need, the record of support actually delivered, the cost of delivering it, or the recording that triggers the claim.
Planned hours do not match the timetable that is actually delivered
The planned hours recorded for 16 to 19 students do not reconcile to the timetable being delivered, so students may be in the wrong funding band.
An aim is on the ILR but generates no funding
The aim validates and appears on the ILR, but generates no earnings. Validation and funding are different tests: a record can be perfectly valid and still not qualify for funding.
See it play out
An enrichment session is cancelled in November
A weekly enrichment session counted in planned hours is withdrawn after half term. Nobody thinks of it as a funding decision.
A student needs maths but nothing shows it
A 16 to 19 student without a qualifying maths grade is studying maths, but the record does not show it.
The December count includes students who have left
Preparing for the December return, the in-learning list is larger than the curriculum areas recognise.
A learner starts three weeks after the class
A late joiner is enrolled with the class start date rather than their own. It looks tidier and it is wrong.
A learner transfers to a different course in October
A learner decides the course is not right for them and moves to a different one. Two aims have to be handled correctly.
A high needs student starts before the top-up is agreed
A student with significant needs starts in September. The local authority top-up has not been agreed by December.
A learner's age puts them in the wrong stream
Whether a learner is funded through 16 to 19 funding or the Adult Skills Fund depends on their age on 31 August in the funding year, not their age at the start of the aim, and from 19 on whether they are continuing a programme they began aged 16 to 18. A date of birth error moves them.
A qualification is withdrawn part way through the year
A qualification the college is delivering stops being available for new starts. Existing learners continue, new ones cannot.
Hours are planned to reach a band rather than to deliver a programme
A programme is designed with just enough hours to reach a higher funding band. Is that legitimate?
Check and evidence it
Monthly return readiness
The checks to run before every ordinary return. Short, repeatable, and the reason the consequential returns are manageable.
R04 readiness
Preparation for the return that is the main source of next year's 16 to 19 student numbers. Everything here has to be right before submission, because a later correction may not restore them.
R14 final return readiness
Preparation for the final hard close, after which the year's ILR data cannot be amended and the funding, the achievement rates and the audit population are all taken from it.
R10 year-end position readiness
Preparation for the return at which the year's funding outcome becomes clear while there is still time to act on it.
Year-end close readiness
The wider close programme that runs from the spring, of which the final return is the last step.
Funding audit readiness
What to have in place before an audit, across every stream. Most of it is the routine you should be running anyway.
16 to 19 assurance
The 16 to 19 specific checks, focused on the areas that are tested most often.
Learning support evidence
A focused review of the learning support chain, which is one of the most consistently tested areas in funding audit.
Enrolment quality review
A front-door review, which is where most funding-critical data is captured and where errors are cheapest to prevent.
Monthly data quality review
The standing data quality review, separate from the return checks, focused on trends rather than individual records.
New funding year setup
What to do before the first enrolments of a new funding year, rather than before the first return.
Governance assurance pack
What a governing body should see about funding, so assurance rests on measures rather than on reassurance.
New MIS starter induction
What a new member of an MIS team should be able to do, and by when. Not a funding control, but the thing that most often goes missing.
Terms you will meet
Official sources for this stream
These are the documents that govern this stream for the funding year. Rates, thresholds and exact conditions come from them, not from here.
Content reused from GOV.UK is Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence. FEFunding is not endorsed by the Department for Education.