Funding rules monitored: 31 official sources · awaiting first verified checkFunding Intelligence →
Skip to the Academy content

Topic

Where Academy concepts appear in your MIS

How the concepts in this Academy map onto the student record systems colleges actually run, and why we do not publish unverified screen paths.

Funding year2026–27Awaiting verificationReviewed18 September 2026See the sourcesReport an issue

Enough detail to do the job and hold a sensible conversation with MIS or Finance.

How to read this page
  • Official requirement: Stated by the official funding document named in the sources for this page.
  • FEFunding explanation: Our plain-English explanation. Helpful, but the official document is the rule.
  • Worked example: An illustration of how the rule applies in one situation. Not a universal rule.
  • Recommended good practice: Operational advice from FEFunding. Not itself a funding requirement.

The concepts are the same, the screens are not

Whatever student record system your college runs, the same concepts exist: a learner, an aim, dates, a funding model, monitoring codes and an outcome.

What differs is where they live on screen, and that varies by product, by version and by how your college has configured it.

That is why this Academy gives system-neutral steps as the default. They are true regardless of the software, and they describe what has to be true rather than which menu to click.

Supplier-specific guidance appears only where it has been verified against that supplier's documentation for a stated version. We do not publish a screen path we cannot verify, because a confidently wrong instruction is worse than no instruction.

Recommended good practice

Screen paths and menu locations in a student record system differ by version and by local configuration. Steps should be confirmed against the supplier's documentation for the version in use before being followed as instructions.

Build your own internal mapping: for each concept in this Academy, where does it live in your system, who maintains it, and what report shows it.

That mapping is the most useful induction document an MIS team can have, and it is specific to your configuration in a way no external guide can be.

Building your own system map

A single table, built once, saves every new starter weeks.

  • The concept, in Academy terms.
  • Where it lives in your system.
  • Who owns it operationally.
  • Which report shows it.
  • What commonly goes wrong with it here.

Keep it against your system version, and review it after an upgrade. Menu locations move, and a map that silently goes out of date is worse than none.

Where you have verified supplier documentation for a step, record the reference. That is what makes the step defensible if somebody follows it and something goes wrong.

The Academy's diagnostic records carry a system-neutral block by default and a supplier block only where a verified source has been recorded, which is the same discipline applied externally.

Recommended good practice

Screen paths and menu locations in a student record system differ by version and by local configuration. Steps should be confirmed against the supplier's documentation for the version in use before being followed as instructions.

Upgrades, configuration and the year rollover

Two things change what your system does: an upgrade from the supplier, and a configuration change made by your own college.

Both can change what appears in the return, and neither announces itself in the data.

The pattern to watch for is a sudden change in validation volume or funded record count that coincides with a system change rather than with anything that happened to learners. When a large number of records start behaving differently at once, the cause is almost never the learners.

The defence is a test generation and validation after any upgrade, before it reaches a live return. It takes an hour and it converts a potential crisis into a known issue.

The funding year rollover is the biggest configuration event of the year. Programme templates, funding models, monitoring codes and aim references all need review before the first enrolments, not before the first return, because an enrolment created under last year's configuration carries the error from day one.

Keep a record of what changed and when. When something behaves unexpectedly three months later, the change log is the fastest route to the cause.

FEFunding explanation

A funding rule is only ever true for a stated funding year. Carrying an answer from one year into another, without checking, is one of the most common causes of an incorrect claim.

Official requirement

An ILR file is validated against the published validation rules for the funding year. Records that fail a validation rule are rejected or excluded from funding until the underlying data is corrected.

Run a test extract through validation under the new specification before the first live generation of a funding year, and after any supplier upgrade. Compare record counts and validation profile against the previous known-good run.

Maintain a dated configuration change log alongside the system map, covering template changes, code list changes and upgrades, so a behavioural change can be matched to a cause rather than investigated from scratch.

Worked examples

Worked example

Mapping one concept

An MIS team maps the concept of a withdrawal into their own system.

  1. Concept. Withdrawal: actual end date, completion status, withdrawal reason.
  2. Where. The enrolment maintenance area of the student record system, recorded against the aim.
  3. Owner. Curriculum administrators, on notification from the course team.
  4. Report. The in-learning report, plus the weekly no-attendance report.
  5. Common failure. The notification date is used instead of the last date of attendance.

One row of a table that answers a question new starters ask for months.

An illustration of the method. The specific locations depend on your system and configuration.

Common pitfalls

Following an unverified screen path

What goes wrong: Instructions found online describe a different version or configuration.

Consequence: The wrong field is changed, or a change is made in a place that does not feed the return.

Prevention: Confirm any supplier-specific step against the documentation for your version before following it.

What this means for your role

Head or director of MIS

Your system map is your induction document and your continuity plan.

  • Build it once, keep it against the version, and review it after every upgrade.

Sources

These are the official documents this page rests on. Where a figure, a deadline or an exact rule matters, the document is the authority and this page is the explanation.

ILR: sources of data (opens in a new tab)

GOV.UKOfficial funding documentAwaiting first verification

Advice: funding rules for 16 to 19 provision 2026 to 2027 (opens in a new tab)

GOV.UKOfficial funding document2026–27Awaiting first verification

Adult Skills Fund funding and performance management rules 2026 to 2027 (opens in a new tab)

GOV.UKOfficial funding document2026–27Awaiting first verification

ILR validation rules 2026 to 2027 (opens in a new tab)

Department for EducationOfficial technical document2026–27Awaiting first verification

Provider support manual 2026 to 2027 (opens in a new tab)

Department for EducationOfficial technical document2026–27Awaiting first verification

Content reused from GOV.UK is Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence. FEFunding is not endorsed by the Department for Education.